Secret John Kerry Senatorial AccomplishmentsĬhanges Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat SpyĬhanges to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care AnymoreĮxamples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' MindĪll-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Her not-too-brilliant hedge-fund manager husband will not provide a reliable big money income. Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at Decem03:23 PM (2ABQr) Chelsea needs annual big money. I don't believe 99% of the country will even remember any of this a year or two out from now. I don't believe anyone of importance will be indicted, or *anybody* will be seriously punished. I don't believe the Foundation any longer matters, except as an ongoing source of laundered funds for Chelsea, perhaps. I do not believe she has a hope of getting the nomination if she does, for some reason, run again. They will die old and evil with an enormous pile of wealth, and soon. Posted by: Wally at Decem03:20 PM (vMWVi) - Yup. I mean, look at them! The thought that we're going to "get them" this time is foolish. Posted by: JackStraw at Decem03:17 PM (ZLI7S)Ģ29 In 3 years, Hillary and/or Bill will be dead. Do you honestly think Durham indicted the Clinton campaign lawyer for lying about the Steele dossier, THE think that not just led to the FISA warrants but set off the entire Russia hoax, and laid a roadmap of where he was going in the indictment and then just shutdown his investigation after Garland confirmed his funding had been renewed? If so then don't pay attention but not everyone agrees with you. This has only been a criminal investigation for coming up on 3 years. The Whitewater investigation took 6 years and it was peanuts compared to this and it didn't have a pandemic in the middle of it that didn't just shutdown mom and pop shops and schools it shutdown federal courts, grand juries and slowed everything down. Because some of us never bought into the #TwoWeeks bullshit. Nothing has happened and nothing will happen. >Why do you guys continue to do this to yourselves? It's been several years of #TwoWeeks bullshit. Techno_Fog wonders if this is meaningful, as far as divulging Durham's beliefs about the Clinton campaign's responsibility for the fake (and criminally fraudulent, it seems) dossier, and who might be next on his list for interviews and subpeonas. Like, clients who rank higher in the criminal conspiracy, let's say, hypothetically and allegedly. Which might mean he might, oh, who knows, fail to zealously represent the interests of Danchenko in order to represent more important clients. The extent to which the Clinton Campaign and/or its representatives directed, solicited, or controlled Danchenko's activities.ĭurham even raises the potential that members of the Clinton Campaign may be called to testify at Danchenko's trial. Meetings or communications between and among the Clinton Campaign, Fusion GPS, and/or Steele regarding or involving Danchenkoĭanchenko knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the Clinton Campaign's role in and activities surrounding the Fusion GPS reports, and The Clinton Campaign's awareness or lack of awareness of Dancehnko's collection methods and sub-sources, The Clinton Campaign's knowledge or lack of knowledge concerning the veracity of information in the Fusion GPS reports sourced by Danchenko, He points out that Danchenko's lawyer might therefore have conflicts of interest when he represents both Danchenko and the Clinton campaign and its personnel, such as: Techno_Fog notes that Igor Danchenko's new lawyer is noted by Durham as also currently representing the 2016 "Hillary For America" presidential campaign (how cozy!!!), "as well as multiple former employees of that campaign, in matters before the Special Counsel." Is this a big catch by Techno_Fog, or is it just a matter of, "well, of course they're vaguely involved 'in matters before the Special Counsel'?" I'm not sure if this really means anything. Techno Fog: Durham Filing Says That Clinton Campaign Personnel Are Involved "In Matters Before the Special Counsel"